Convicted soldiers deserve to die — Ex-generals

Some retired senior military officers have backed the death sentence passed on 12 soldiers of the Nigerian Army for committing mutiny.

The officers told SUNDAY PUNCH that it was indispensable for the military to maintain its age-long rules on discipline.

The soldiers were court-martialled for a variety of offences, including firing shots at the General Officer Commanding, 7 Division of the Nigerian Army, Major General Ahmed Mohammed, in Maiduguri, Borno State.

The military court, which convicted the soldiers in Abuja, found 13 out of the 18 soldiers guilty of mutiny, malefactor conspiracy, endeavored murder (shooting at the conveyance of the GOC); insubordination and erroneous incrimination.

Twelve of the convicted soldiers were sentenced to death, five were discharged and acquitted, while the remaining one was jailed for 28 days with hard labour.

Those sentenced to death were Jasper Braidolor, David Musa, Friday Onuh, Yusuf Shuaibu, Igonmu Emmanuel, Andrew Ugbede, Nurudeen Ahmed, Ifeanyi Alukagba, Alao Samuel, Amadi Chukwuma, Alan Linus, and Stephen Clement.

In the aftermath of the conviction, some prominent Nigerians and pressure groups have urged the military not to carry out the sentences.

But the retired senior military officers who verbalized with our correspondents hailed the judgment and verbally expressed it would have to be carried out.

A former Commandant of the Nigerian Army School of Infantry, Brig.-Gen. Williams Obene (retd.), verbalized, “I commend the boldness of the Army ascendant entities to follow the terms and conditions of accommodation – the extant laws that established the armed forces, particularly the Army– and for endeavoring to uphold discipline at the highest caliber.

“When politicians and highly influential Nigerians interfere in the quotidian administration of the military, things become arduous. That situation is very prevalent under democracy.”

Additionally, a former Adjutant-General of the Nigerian Army, Major General David Jemibewon (retd.), verbally expressed the court martial must have considered available evidence and circumstances afore reaching its decision on the soldiers.

Jemibewon who is a former Minister of Police Affairs verbalized, “The military does not operate on sentiments or on people expressing either sympathy or lack of sympathy. Most of the things (we do) in the military are predicated on laws. It is arduous for me to align with people calling for clemency or pardon.

“The court martial has the facts and they have now come to conclusion after sanctioning evidence.”

In the same vein, retired Colonel Anthony Nyiam additionally hailed the judgment. Nyiam, was one of those sentenced to death by the regime of former head of state, Ibrahim Babangida, verbally expressed, “As a soldier, and respecter of the law and tradition, the worst thing a soldier can do is to mutiny. And the penalty, as the law verbally expresses, should be accommodated. If you interrupt the traditions of the military, you’re interfering with the substructures.”

Similarly, a former military administrator of Bauchi and Osun states, Col. Theophilus Bamigboye (retd.), backed the sentence, integrating that it was in line with military rules and regulations.

He verbally expressed, “The court has followed the laid down procedure and military etiquette. They (the court) must have optically canvassed the entire situations afore arriving at the sentence.

“We have our own laws and so many things regulating our conduct in the military. I will not optate anybody to die but we are verbalizing of military procedure, which has to be followed.”

Meanwhile, the Nigerian Army has verbally expressed it is waiting for the approbation of the Chief of Army Staff, Lt.-Gen. Kenneth Minimah, on the death sentence given to the soldiers.

In an interview with one of our correspondents, the Director, Army Public Relations, Brig.-Gen. Olajide Laleye, insisted that the military must handle its matters in line with stipulated procedures even in the face of contrary public opinion.

He verbally expressed, “The issues are these: was an offence committed; did the military follow due process in prosecuting those involved in the offence; were the cases duly prosecuted in a court of law recognised by the law?

“The Army followed standard military procedures, set up a court that is recognised by the laws of the country and carried out the tribulation in line with the procedures of the military.

“But why are people even jumping the gun. The judgment is still awaiting substantiation by the Chief of Army Staff.”